Zany Zach's Blog

Amateur blog for mostly Film/CD/Book/TV reviews ………

Overegging the pudding? Insidious Part II Review

In an attempt to dissect the audience’s pathological obsession with violence, James Waan revolutionised the horror genre by adding a significant element of torture porn violence into his Saw films – racking the bloodletting to utterly depraved levels to seduce audiences with sexualised set pieces of OTT violence. However, this consistent bloodletting, which became nauseous and unnecessary in its sequels, had not sapped the suspenseful atmosphere that Waan quickly become famous for – despite the mediocrity of the storytelling that the scriptwriters so blatantly disregarded.

Insidious_–_Chapter_2_Poster

Hence, Insidious in 2011 was Waan’s return to the suspenseful atmosphere that he contingently manufactured. Eschewing the abovementioned torture porn gimmicks and supernatural conceits – palpable to guarantee cinema goes in their vast numbers – his focus laid primarily in dread and kinesis of camera movements to generate an atmosphere of supernatural suspense. Insidious was the result of the consummate ease that he staged an effective horror tale, which not only embraced the clichés plaguing mainstream horror, but cofounded its audiences for its derivation of scares from a narrative that engaged them on a minimal psychological level.

629304_055

After the brutal cliff-hanger of the first film, this sequel, in stark contrast, takes its time in setting up back story. Hilariously, in the opening segment, the voice of a deceased character is unconvincingly dubbed onto a younger actress. This particular sequence is a flashback, it appears, where we are finally given the explanation of the Josh’s suppression of his astral projection powers that inadvertently instigated the chaos in the first film.

IL1A1630.CR2

Shifting to present day, we see Josh’s wife, Renee, conversing with the police under a spotlight (funny, considering the fluorescents that dominate conventional police stations) about the validity of her supporting alibi for a brutal murder at the end the first film. Could it be that Josh’s astral projection powers have resulted not only in homicide but………. whisper it…….possession?

gdfgdf

The franchise mythology, so underdeveloped in the original, is deepened to modest effect here. The instalments of interludes that dissect the psychopathological state of the antagonist is intensified by Waan’s surrealistic vision and enthusiasm for grotesque abominations that typify his vision of the afterlife – that is anything but angels and harps. His stocks of scares also remain startlingly adept: Waan is never really short on inspiration when it comes to making his audiences jump with uniform terror that seeps into their mindset, causing a sense of dread throughout.

insidious2thumb

The style would seem almost refreshing were it not for the convolutions of a multi-stranded narrative that takes some of the lustre of the more honed psychological aspects of the tale. Waan is a little guilty of overegging the story with too many sub-plots. The result is an overcooked narrative force that fragments into three strands: Josh’s mother, Lorraine, in a grotesque expedition; the events in the real world as Renee is relentlessly terrorised by the evading supernatural forces; the climax in ‘The Further’. Compounding matters even further is the loopier aspects of the plot: It appears that the abovementioned flashback itself forms a springboard for time travel theatrics that are unduly redundant in the bigger and broader aspects of the increasingly tangled story.

 

insidious-chapter-2-10805-p-1379069831-470-75

Consequently, deepening the franchise mythology is a laudable act, but Waan and his team are not adept enough to skilfully juggle multi-stranded plotting with relentless terror and psychological threat to sustain interest throughout. The result is a mixed bag of disjointed theatrics.

In many ways a better movie than the first, but without the element of surprise and the simplicity in many other ways it’s also hopelessly inferior.

2 comments on “Overegging the pudding? Insidious Part II Review

  1. James Derry
    May 10, 2014

    Too bad; I enjoyed the first one. Considering that it’s now on Netflix, I’ll probably still check it out.

  2. Cindy
    May 11, 2014

    I am a huge fan of both movies but I like the second movie better. I love the way they tied in so many parts from the first movie. It really made for a cohesive story. Something other mivie sequels have failed to do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on May 10, 2014 by in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 141,095 other followers

%d bloggers like this: